<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Greg Krehbiel on Publishing and Online Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing</link>
	<description>Thoughts and lessons learned from a B2B / B2C publishing professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:50:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s a reasonable bounce rate? by Greg Krehbiel</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2009/07/07/whats-a-reasonable-bounce-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Krehbiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=49#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Good idea. Thanks for the input, Julia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea. Thanks for the input, Julia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s a reasonable bounce rate? by Resources for Marketers</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2009/07/07/whats-a-reasonable-bounce-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Resources for Marketers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 06:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=49#comment-181</guid>
		<description>One little trick I&#039;ve discovered that lowers my wordpress blogs bounce rate is a clever little backlinking strategy

If you have a series of posts under a specific category when backlinking, concentrate your linking to the category rather than individual posts.

For example if you have an SEO blog and one of your categories is &#039;back linking techniques&#039; and you have 10 posts under that category. When targeting the keyword &#039;back linking techniques&#039; link to the category rather than the individual posts. It allows you to concentrate linking to one url rather than having a smaller number of links to a group of posts (i.e. better 500 back links to one category than 100 each to five posts).

I&#039;ve used this technique successfully for several categories to rank on page 1 of google search results for higher competition keywords. I have several category pages that actually have google PR as a result (not that PR is a big deal... it&#039;s more of a vanity thing LOL)

The advantage with this strategy is that when people land on the category page they see several related posts rather than just one. This reduces bounce rate by making them curious. They&#039;ll click through to one post then go back to the category and click through to another. Sometimes in my stats I&#039;ll see them click through to four or five posts in the one category. 

Julia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One little trick I&#8217;ve discovered that lowers my wordpress blogs bounce rate is a clever little backlinking strategy</p>
<p>If you have a series of posts under a specific category when backlinking, concentrate your linking to the category rather than individual posts.</p>
<p>For example if you have an SEO blog and one of your categories is &#8216;back linking techniques&#8217; and you have 10 posts under that category. When targeting the keyword &#8216;back linking techniques&#8217; link to the category rather than the individual posts. It allows you to concentrate linking to one url rather than having a smaller number of links to a group of posts (i.e. better 500 back links to one category than 100 each to five posts).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used this technique successfully for several categories to rank on page 1 of google search results for higher competition keywords. I have several category pages that actually have google PR as a result (not that PR is a big deal&#8230; it&#8217;s more of a vanity thing LOL)</p>
<p>The advantage with this strategy is that when people land on the category page they see several related posts rather than just one. This reduces bounce rate by making them curious. They&#8217;ll click through to one post then go back to the category and click through to another. Sometimes in my stats I&#8217;ll see them click through to four or five posts in the one category. </p>
<p>Julia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOPA, the copyright anarchists, and the future of content by Mike</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2012/01/18/sopa-the-copyright-anarchists-and-the-future-of-content/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=251#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Yeah, &quot;content wants to be free&quot; is shorthand for &quot;I don&#039;t want to pay anything&quot;.  That&#039;s stupid - but breaking the internet and creating a situation where people&#039;s sites can be shut down because a user in their forum linked to a copyrighted picture is overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, &#8220;content wants to be free&#8221; is shorthand for &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to pay anything&#8221;.  That&#8217;s stupid &#8211; but breaking the internet and creating a situation where people&#8217;s sites can be shut down because a user in their forum linked to a copyrighted picture is overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOPA, the copyright anarchists, and the future of content by Greg Krehbiel</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2012/01/18/sopa-the-copyright-anarchists-and-the-future-of-content/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Krehbiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=251#comment-178</guid>
		<description>That is a valid concern. Most of what I&#039;ve seen in the anti-SOPA rants has been &quot;content wants to be free&quot; stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a valid concern. Most of what I&#8217;ve seen in the anti-SOPA rants has been &#8220;content wants to be free&#8221; stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOPA, the copyright anarchists, and the future of content by Mike</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2012/01/18/sopa-the-copyright-anarchists-and-the-future-of-content/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=251#comment-177</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-175&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Greg Krehbiel&lt;/a&gt; 
The measures attempt to change the very backbone (DNS) of the internet in ways that are not well thought out for one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-175" rel="nofollow">@Greg Krehbiel</a><br />
The measures attempt to change the very backbone (DNS) of the internet in ways that are not well thought out for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOPA, the copyright anarchists, and the future of content by Mike</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2012/01/18/sopa-the-copyright-anarchists-and-the-future-of-content/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=251#comment-176</guid>
		<description>This is an example of a company&#039;s (whose technical opinion I trust on a matter like this) stance on SOPA/PIPA: http://www.thoughtworks.com/news/press-release-thoughtworks-technology-advisory-board-statement-sopa-pipa-18-january-2012</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an example of a company&#8217;s (whose technical opinion I trust on a matter like this) stance on SOPA/PIPA: <a href="http://www.thoughtworks.com/news/press-release-thoughtworks-technology-advisory-board-statement-sopa-pipa-18-january-2012" rel="nofollow">http://www.thoughtworks.com/news/press-release-thoughtworks-technology-advisory-board-statement-sopa-pipa-18-january-2012</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOPA, the copyright anarchists, and the future of content by Greg Krehbiel</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2012/01/18/sopa-the-copyright-anarchists-and-the-future-of-content/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Krehbiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=251#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Good thoughts, and I agree with a lot of what you&#039;re saying. 

It seems like the main problem with SOPA is the lack of review when copyright infringement is alleged against a site. (Which seems like a very fixable problem.) 

Is there anything else that stands out to you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts, and I agree with a lot of what you&#8217;re saying. </p>
<p>It seems like the main problem with SOPA is the lack of review when copyright infringement is alleged against a site. (Which seems like a very fixable problem.) </p>
<p>Is there anything else that stands out to you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOPA, the copyright anarchists, and the future of content by Mike</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2012/01/18/sopa-the-copyright-anarchists-and-the-future-of-content/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=251#comment-174</guid>
		<description>While I agree that something has to be done about rampant piracy of content (speaking as someone who works in the same field of selling content) it seems that SOPA is like trying to kill a mosquito with a bazooka.  There has to be a middle way here that protects the content producer while also helping the consumer.

As an example, once Apple made it easy and relatively cheap to purchase digital music a la carte, I immediately started purchasing songs from them when I would have skipped purchasing a full CD if that was the only option.  Rather than a strict DRM model now, Apple actually watermarks your music with your AppleID so that dis-incentivizes me from sharing that music outside my family.  That seems like a reasonable trade-off to protect them and allow me the convenience of purchasing a la carte songs.

The major problem I have with SOPA is that it seems to be the product of media companies circling the wagons around out of date business models that a solely built on scarcity.  Every consumer ends up being treated like a potential criminal who is just dying to give the content to others when in reality, most consumers just want an easy way to purchase the content once and consume it on multiple devices and form factors.  If I purchase a movie, why shouldn&#039;t I be able to watch it on my TV, desktop, laptop, iPad and/or iPhone?  

I don&#039;t generally purchase e-books most of the time because there is such a messed up network of permissions surrounding whether or not I can lend the copy to someone else to read after I&#039;m done with it.  The way I read a book is to read it and lend it to friends and family who might be interested so we can discuss it.  It&#039;s my book.  I didn&#039;t purchase a single user license to it (although you can argue that the form factor of a physical book implies at least a single concurrency usage).  I certainly don&#039;t like the fact that if my wife and I have Kindles attached to two different Amazon accounts, we can&#039;t even share the same book in most cases.

The world of content is changing rapidly and has already changed - SOPA seems (from what I understand) to be trying to put the genie back in the bottle and punish everyone rather than trying to help content providers find a reasonable way to sell the content to the consumers who are ready and willing to pay them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that something has to be done about rampant piracy of content (speaking as someone who works in the same field of selling content) it seems that SOPA is like trying to kill a mosquito with a bazooka.  There has to be a middle way here that protects the content producer while also helping the consumer.</p>
<p>As an example, once Apple made it easy and relatively cheap to purchase digital music a la carte, I immediately started purchasing songs from them when I would have skipped purchasing a full CD if that was the only option.  Rather than a strict DRM model now, Apple actually watermarks your music with your AppleID so that dis-incentivizes me from sharing that music outside my family.  That seems like a reasonable trade-off to protect them and allow me the convenience of purchasing a la carte songs.</p>
<p>The major problem I have with SOPA is that it seems to be the product of media companies circling the wagons around out of date business models that a solely built on scarcity.  Every consumer ends up being treated like a potential criminal who is just dying to give the content to others when in reality, most consumers just want an easy way to purchase the content once and consume it on multiple devices and form factors.  If I purchase a movie, why shouldn&#8217;t I be able to watch it on my TV, desktop, laptop, iPad and/or iPhone?  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t generally purchase e-books most of the time because there is such a messed up network of permissions surrounding whether or not I can lend the copy to someone else to read after I&#8217;m done with it.  The way I read a book is to read it and lend it to friends and family who might be interested so we can discuss it.  It&#8217;s my book.  I didn&#8217;t purchase a single user license to it (although you can argue that the form factor of a physical book implies at least a single concurrency usage).  I certainly don&#8217;t like the fact that if my wife and I have Kindles attached to two different Amazon accounts, we can&#8217;t even share the same book in most cases.</p>
<p>The world of content is changing rapidly and has already changed &#8211; SOPA seems (from what I understand) to be trying to put the genie back in the bottle and punish everyone rather than trying to help content providers find a reasonable way to sell the content to the consumers who are ready and willing to pay them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick thought by TeleMoxie</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2011/06/21/quick-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>TeleMoxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=212#comment-156</guid>
		<description>&quot;anything worth doing is worth doing badly&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;anything worth doing is worth doing badly&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What marketing needs to know about IT by GregK</title>
		<link>http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/2010/11/22/what-marketing-needs-to-know-about-it/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>GregK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregkrehbiel.com/marketing/?p=159#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Yes, I thought it hit all the right points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I thought it hit all the right points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

